SC: Procedural rules on anti-terror law cases take effect Jan. 15

The Supreme Court facade. (Photo form PNA)/ FILE

By Benjamin Pulta | Philippine News Agency

The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday said it has approved the procedural rules on petitions and applications in connection with the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 (ATA) and its related laws.

In a statement, the tribunal said the Rules on the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 and Related Laws (A.M. No. 22-02-19-SC) would take effect on Jan. 15.

“The Rules shall apply to petitions and applications regarding detentions without judicial warrants of arrest, surveillance orders, freeze orders, restrictions on travel, designations, proscriptions, and other court issuances promulgated to implement the ATA and other related laws,” the SC said.

The rules contain the procedure for the issuance of an order of proscription by the Court of Appeals (CA), upon a suit by the Department of Justice to declare as outlawed terrorist any group of persons, organization, or association.

It likewise provides the procedure for an individual, organization, association, or group of persons who go to court to question their designation as terrorist by the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) and the issuance of any freeze order by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC).

The rules also mandate a law enforcement agent or military personnel to secure a prior written surveillance order from the CA to be able to secretly wiretap, overhear, listen to, intercept, screen, read, surveil, record, or collect private communications, conversation, or messages between members of a judicially-proscribed terrorist organization.

The rules also cover action on “members of designated persons” under Republic Act 10168 or the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act of 2012.

The rules provide that under certain circumstances, a person suspected of committing any of the acts under ATA, and any member of a group, organization, or association proscribed can be arrested and detained by any law enforcement agent or military personnel without a judicial warrant of arrest.

The detention without a warrant cannot exceed the period under the Revised Penal Code unless authorized in writing by the ATC for a period of up to 14 calendar days and, thereafter, by a designated regional trial court for not more than 10 calendar days.

In cases involving those belonging to the most vulnerable groups such as the elderly, pregnant, persons with disability, women, and children who are unable to safeguard their interests, the court shall appoint a guardian.

The parties can likewise avail of other existing remedies, such as the writs of habeas corpus, amparo, and habeas data, and appeals to the SC when appropriate.

Popular

DMW shuts down tourism consultancy agency in Ortigas

By Gab Humilde Villegas | PTV News The Department of Migrant Workers (DMW) shut down a tourism consultancy agency in Ortigas, Pasig City on Friday...

PBBM hails Presidential Air Wing for nearly six decades of service to the nation

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet After navigating a jam-packed itinerary in Central Luzon, President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. rounded off his Wednesday engagements with an attendance...

PBBM eyes more concrete measures to address effects of climate change

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet As climate change makes its presence felt in various countries, especially the Philippines, President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. has shifted his...

PBBM to LGUs: Observe firm implementation of ‘no-build zones’ to address flooding woes

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet As the enhanced southwest monsoon (habagat) continues to shed light on long-neglected matters, President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. made it clear...