PBBM: SC ruling on Sara impeachment ‘has no bearing on merits’

President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. and Vice President Sara Duterte. (Photo courtesy: PCO / OVP)

By Darryl John Esguerra | Philippine News Agency

President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. clarified on Friday that the Supreme Court’s decision related to the shelved impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte addressed only procedural issues and did not touch on the substance of the complaint.

“Let me clarify. The merits of the case were not examined by the Supreme Court… This does not decide the merits of the case. It just talked about procedure. So the procedure was faulty, was lacking. So ‘yun ang assessment ng Supreme Court,” Marcos told Philippine delegation reporters in a briefing during his state visit to India.

“It has no bearing on the rightness or wrongness of the impeachment.”

Marcos said there has been no trial and the impeachment complaint’s contents were never debated upon.

“Again, there has been no trial. So the merits of the case have not been examined, tried, adjudicated, argued, discussed. So, accountability just doesn’t come into it. People have to understand, it is a procedural question,” he said.

“Sinabi, mali ‘yung date, hindi tama ang paggagawa ng House. Walang kinalaman ‘doon sa laman ng impeachment complaint. Kung hindi, kung paano ‘yung pagkahandle ng impeachment.”

The President stressed that the executive branch had no role in the impeachment proceedings.

“I keep telling you, the executive has no role in this. The President has no role. I’m an impeachable officer. I cannot involve myself in any of this. So, it’s really the Supreme Court, the Senate and the House,” he said.

The Senate on Wednesday approved the motion of Senator Rodante Marcoleta to “adhere to the immediately executory decision” of the SC en banc dated July 25, 2025, effectively archiving the impeachment complaint.

A separate motion by Senate Minority Leader Vicente Sotto III to lay Marcoleta’s motion on the table lost in a vote of 19 affirmative against 5 negative votes.

The High Court’s unanimous decision held that the complaint violated the Constitution’s one-year bar rule and failed to provide due process to the respondent, leading the tribunal to invalidate the proceedings from the outset.

Popular

Palace: No holiday break for PBBM, key agencies during Holy Week

By Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos | Philippine News Agency There will be no holiday break for President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. and key government agencies during...

PBBM: 131 Kalayaan Island features in Palawan, WPS to adopt local names

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet In a move to assert sovereignty over the hotly contested islands and features in the West Philippine Sea (WPS), President Ferdinand...

DBCC to discuss oil excise tax this week —PBBM

By Brian Campued The Development Budget Coordination Committee (DBCC) is set to convene this week to discuss its assessment on the possible implementation of a...

Malacañang sets half-day WFH setup for gov’t offices on Holy Wednesday

By Brian Campued Malacañang on Tuesday directed government offices to implement work-from-home arrangement on Holy Wednesday, in light of the observance of Holy Week. In Memorandum...