PBBM: SC ruling on Sara impeachment ‘has no bearing on merits’

President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. and Vice President Sara Duterte. (Photo courtesy: PCO / OVP)

By Darryl John Esguerra | Philippine News Agency

President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. clarified on Friday that the Supreme Court’s decision related to the shelved impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte addressed only procedural issues and did not touch on the substance of the complaint.

“Let me clarify. The merits of the case were not examined by the Supreme Court… This does not decide the merits of the case. It just talked about procedure. So the procedure was faulty, was lacking. So ‘yun ang assessment ng Supreme Court,” Marcos told Philippine delegation reporters in a briefing during his state visit to India.

“It has no bearing on the rightness or wrongness of the impeachment.”

Marcos said there has been no trial and the impeachment complaint’s contents were never debated upon.

“Again, there has been no trial. So the merits of the case have not been examined, tried, adjudicated, argued, discussed. So, accountability just doesn’t come into it. People have to understand, it is a procedural question,” he said.

“Sinabi, mali ‘yung date, hindi tama ang paggagawa ng House. Walang kinalaman ‘doon sa laman ng impeachment complaint. Kung hindi, kung paano ‘yung pagkahandle ng impeachment.”

The President stressed that the executive branch had no role in the impeachment proceedings.

“I keep telling you, the executive has no role in this. The President has no role. I’m an impeachable officer. I cannot involve myself in any of this. So, it’s really the Supreme Court, the Senate and the House,” he said.

The Senate on Wednesday approved the motion of Senator Rodante Marcoleta to “adhere to the immediately executory decision” of the SC en banc dated July 25, 2025, effectively archiving the impeachment complaint.

A separate motion by Senate Minority Leader Vicente Sotto III to lay Marcoleta’s motion on the table lost in a vote of 19 affirmative against 5 negative votes.

The High Court’s unanimous decision held that the complaint violated the Constitution’s one-year bar rule and failed to provide due process to the respondent, leading the tribunal to invalidate the proceedings from the outset.

Popular

NMC backs DND over infra works, dev’t in West PH Sea features

By Brian Campued The National Maritime Council (NMC) on Saturday expressed support for the Department of National Defense (DND) for its rejection of recent statements...

Filipino astrophysics students’ ‘Double Gyroscope’ experiment performed by NASA astronaut in space

By Brian Campued An experiment designed by Filipino students was recently carried out by a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) astronaut aboard the International...

Can an arrest warrant be served to a suspect’s lawyer? NBI says no

By Brian Campued A warrant of arrest cannot be served to a suspect’s legal counsel, according to the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI). In a press...

Palace declares May 27 regular holiday for Eid al-Adha

By Brian Campued Malacañang has declared May 27, 2026 a regular holiday in observance of Eid al-Adha or the “Feast of Sacrifice” in Islam. The announcement...