DOJ junks Duterte’s filed charges vs. Abalos, Marbil over KOJC raid

JUNKED. Former DILG secretary Benhur Abalos (center) and PNP chief PGEN. Rommel Francisco Marbil (sitting left) presented Pastor Apollo Quiboloy (in black Agila cap) and his co-accused in a press briefing at Camp Crame, Quezon City on Sept. 9, 2024. The Department of Justice on May 13, dismissed the charges against Abalos, Marbil, and other PNP officials for allegedly damaging the gate of the KOJC compound in Barangay Buhangin and at the Prayer and Glory Mountains in Barangay Tamayong, Davao City. (Photo courtesy: PNP / FILE)

By Benjamin Pulta | Philippine News Agency

The Department of Justice (DOJ) dismissed the charges filed by former President Rodrigo Duterte against former Interior secretary Benhur Abalos and Philippine National Police chief PGEN. Rommel Francisco Marbil in connection with the serving of the arrest warrant against Pastor Apollo Quiboloy in Davao City in September 2024.

In a 13-page resolution dated May 13, Assistant State Prosecutor Angelica Laygo-Francisco “dismissed for lack of probable cause” the charges of malicious mischief and violation of domicile against Abalos, Marbil, and other PNP officials for damaging the gate of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ (KOJC) compound in Barangay Buhangin and at the Prayer and Glory Mountains in Barangay Tamayong.

Duterte, filed the complaint in his capacity as “the kingdom administrator of all properties within the Philippines of the executive pastor of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ, the Name Above Every Name, Inc.”

Included as respondents were PBGEN. Aligre Martinez, PMGEN. Ronald Oliver Lee, PCOL. Edwin Portento, PCOL. Joselito Clarito, PLTCOL. Lino Akiangan, PMGEN. Mark Pespes and PBGEN. Ricardo Layug.

In dismissing the charges, the prosecutors said there was no proof sufficient to charge the officials, at least three of which were not even present on the site during the raid.

“It bears emphasis that criminal prosecutions demand more than the invocation of high office and presumed authority. The law requires evidence of individual culpability—of specific, intentional acts that constitute the offense. The present complaints offer none.”

It added that the records are barren of any factual or legal basis to sustain the prosecution of the respondents for the offenses charged.

“The totality of evidence fails to show that they personally committed or directed the commission of either malicious mischief or violation of domicile. Their actions, as alleged, fall within the realm of lawful performance of duty and are protected by the presumption of regularity in official functions.”

Popular

VP on trial: What you need to know about the impeachment of Sara Duterte

By Brian Campued About five months since the second series of impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte was formally initiated, the House prosecution panel...

Impeachment trial: The pursuit of truth, justice, and accountability

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet At its core, every government around the world implements a set of checks and balances enshrined in its respective constitution to...

Canadian firms’ $15.9B investment pledges seen to boost PH mining sector

By Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos | Philippine News Agency Canadian gold and copper producer OceanaGold Corp. has pledged to invest $1.9 billion for the continued operation...

PBBM positions PH as ‘responsible’ hub for mineral processing

By Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos | Philippine News Agency President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. on Friday (Canada time) positioned the Philippines as a “responsible” hub for...