Palace: Prosecution evidence strengthens case vs VP Sara

Photo courtesy: PCO

By Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos | Philippine News Agency

Malacañang on Tuesday said evidence presented by the prosecution in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte has strengthened the case for her conviction, particularly over the alleged misuse of confidential funds.

Palace Press Officer Claire Castro said testimony from former Office of the Vice President (OVP) special disbursing officer (SDO) Gina Acosta showed that Duterte exercised control over the release of P125 million in confidential funds.

Castro made the statement during a Palace press briefing when asked about Acosta’s testimony that she never personally saw Duterte take or keep any of the money she disbursed.

Castro said physically handling the funds was not necessary to establish accountability, noting that Acosta testified that Duterte ordered the release of the entire P125 million to her security officer, Col. Raymund Dante Lachica.

“So, ang ibig sabihin nito, ang may command, ang may kontrol ay walang iba kung ‘di si VP Sara,” she said.

Castro said the testimony indicated that Duterte could exercise control over the funds through orders even without physically handling the money.

She also said Lachica’s role in implementing the confidential fund should be investigated by the Office of the Ombudsman.

Castro said a neutral agency should determine whether wrongdoing or possible conspiracy occurred in the use of the funds.

She also criticized Acosta’s repeated assertion during the trial that she relied on Lachica for information on the implementation of the confidential funds.

“Dito ay makikita ng sambayanang Pilipino kung paano naging dekahon ang sagot ng witness. Paulit-ulit kahit sa ang daling tanong, doon pa rin at doon at doon ang iikot ang sagot niya,” the Palace official said.

Castro also questioned the liquidation of the confidential funds handled by Acosta, saying her testimony indicated difficulties in accounting for the funds.

She stressed that confidential funds remain public funds and must be properly accounted for.

“Kapag hindi naisaayos mabuti at nawawala ng mga dokumento, ang ibig sabihin niyan may prima facie evidence na ito ay nagamit ng personal,” she said.

Asked whether the prosecution had presented enough evidence to merit Duterte’s conviction, Castro said the Palace believed it had, at least on the impeachment article involving the confidential funds.

“Sa ngayon po, ayon sa Palasyo, in a way, yes. Pagdating sa pagturo kay Bise Presidente, kay Col. Lachica na sila ang nag-control ng pondo para sa confidential funds,” Castro said. (PNA)

Popular

PBBM supports SC call for Congress’ passage of anti-dynasty law

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. continues to support institutional reforms that would bring long-overdue changes expected to rekindle the citizenry’s trust...

Malacañang cuts gov’t work hours on Sept. 28 for National Family Week

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet Close family ties lie at the heart of Filipino culture, which extends to sharing stories and cherished memories at the dining...

Malacañang to Roque: Come home, face allegations

By Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos | Philippine News Agency Malacañang on Wednesday urged former Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque to return to the Philippines and answer the...

Malacañang backs PNP report of generally peaceful BARMM elections

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet Along with the release of the results of BARMM’s first parliamentary elections came the assessment of the Philippine National Police (PNP)...