The Supreme Court has spoken — Palace

Malacañang on Tuesday lauded the Supreme Court (SC) decision affirming the constitutionality of President Rodrigo Duterte’s declaration of martial law in Mindanao even as it reiterated its call for full support and cooperation from the public.

“The High Court has spoken. Proclamation 216 is constitutional,” Presidential Spokesperson Ernesto Abella said in a statement.

With the ruling, the Palace official assured the people that President Duterte remains fully committed to end the evil of terrorism and asked everyone to fully support the government in the war against terror.

FILE : President Duterte clarified his purpose of declaring Martial Law that is to protect and preserve the country. He also assured he will not allow any abuses to be committed by law enforcers during the period of Martial Law. Photo taken during his arrival in NAIA 2 from his official visit in Russia on May 24, 2017. (Presidential Photo)

“The President is sworn to protect the Filipino people. He will not waver in this commitment to end rebellion, the evil of terrorism and to liberate Marawi. With the Supreme Court decision, the whole government now stands together as one against a common enemy,” he said.

“We ask the public to give their full support and cooperation to local authorities. After all, securing communities is a responsibility that must be shared by everyone,” Abella said.

Earlier Tuesday, the SC, through an 11-3-1 ruling, validated President Duterte’s May 23 declaration placing the entire Mindanao under martial law following clashes between state security forces and Islamic State-inspired terrorists from the Maute and Abu Sayyaf group.

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus was also suspended in the region.

The 11 magistrates who favored the President’s Proclamation 216 were Associate Justices Presbitero J. Velasco, Jr., Teresita J. Leonardo-De Castro, Diosdado M. Peralta, Lucas P. Bersamin, Mariano C. Del Castillo, Jose C. Mendoza, Bienvenido L. Reyes, Estela M. Perlas-Bernabe, Francis H. Jardeleza, Samuel R. Martires and Noel G. Tijam.

Meanwhile, three Justices voted that martial law should only cover Marawi City and nearby areas.

They were Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio and Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa.

Only Associate Justice Marvic Leonen said the martial law declaration has no factual basis. (PNA)

Popular

PBBM laments lack of progress in resolving South China Sea disputes

By Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos | Philippine News Agency President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. on Thursday expressed dismay over the lack of further progress in addressing...

Palace slams VP Sara’s remarks on ‘inadequate protection’ for OFWs, ‘no comment’ on ICC charges vs. FPRRD

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet At the Malacañang press briefing held on Wednesday, Presidential Communications Office (PCO) Undersecretary and Palace Press Officer Claire Castro responded to...

Palace: PBBM ‘doing well’ amid lack of public engagements

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet Presidential Communications Office (PCO) Undersecretary and Palace Press Officer Claire Castro reassured the masses that President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. is...

PBBM signs ARROW Act into law for right-of-way acquisition reform

By Dean Aubrey Caratiquet In a bid to improve bureaucratic efficiency and ensure relevance to modern conventions, President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. has signed into...