MANILA — The Office of the Ombudsman has charged before the Sandiganbayan former Northern Kabuntalan, Maguindanao Mayor Datu Umbra Dilangalen Al Hadj for violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act over an allegedly anomalous water project in 2011.
Also facing charges are municipal accountant Rahima Ali and municipal treasurer Kabiba Mael.
The probe showed that in 2011, the three respondents received the amount of PHP5 million for the construction of the municipality’s small water impounding project (SWIP).
Procurement documents showed that the Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) conducted its pre-bid conference on Nov. 21, 2011, just two days before the opening of bids scheduled on Nov. 23, 2011.
The respondents paid the contractor, FFJJ Construction, in full despite the non-completion of the project.
In its resolution, the Ombudsman said: “The attending circumstances show that respondents Dilangalen, Mael, and Ali acted with manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence, and gave unwarranted benefits, advantage, or preference to FFJJ Construction when they signed the disbursement vouchers, thereby causing the first and final payment for the SWIP.”
“At no time should full payment be made prior to the completion of the project, which is what happened in this case,” it added.
Ali and Mael were found guilty of grave misconduct and ordered dismissed from the service with the accessory penalties of cancellation of eligibility, forfeiture of retirement benefits, perpetual disqualification from holding public office, and bar from taking civil service examinations.
The Ombudsman also found BAC Chairman Teng Ungkakay and BAC members Basser Macarimbang and Averose Savidra guilty of simple misconduct and ordered their suspension for three months for non-compliance with Section 22 of Republic Act No. 9184, or the “Government Procurement Reform Act,” which requires that a pre-bid conference be held at least 12 days before the deadline for the submission and receipt of bids.
The anti-graft body added that in case of separation from the service, the penalty of dismissal from the service is convertible to a fine equivalent to the respondents’ salary for one year, and in the case of respondents ordered suspended, their salary for three months. (/PNA)
